Miss Letting-Go-Getting


X-mas Wish List: ATM of books
September 20, 2008, 3:28 pm
Filed under: Books, Library Land, Videos | Tags:

So if any of you have been plagued with the conundrum of what to get me for Christ’s birthday, fret no more.  You can buy me The Espresso Book Machine.  It can print a 300 page paper back with a color cover on-demand in 3 minutes.  Wowza.

It is only $50,000.

Please. Pretty please. 

XXXOOO

Miss LGG



Librarians: Censorship Superheroes! Battling One Closed-Minded Person at a Time!
August 3, 2008, 5:34 am
Filed under: Books, Library Land | Tags: ,

Hello darling readers! I am alive and better than well and ready to start blogging again! I’ll regale you with adventures and discoveries of the past weeks in my next post, but first…check out this amazing letter written by a librarian in response to a patron asking that Uncle Bobby’s Wedding, a children’s book with a gay marriage, be removed from the shelves.

Dear Ms. Patron:

Thank you for working with my assistant to allow me to fit your concerns about “Uncle Bobby’s Wedding,” by Sarah S. Brannen, into our “reconsideration” process. I have been assured that you have received and viewed our relevant policies: the Library Bill of Rights, the Freedom to Read, Free Access to Libraries for Minors, the Freedom to View, and our Reconsideration Policy.

The intent of providing all that isn’t just to occupy your time. It’s to demonstrate that our lay Board of Trustees –- which has reviewed and adopted these policies on behalf of our library — has spent time thinking about the context in which the library operates, and thoughtfully considered the occasional discomfort (with our culture or constituents) that might result. There’s a lot to consider.

Here’s what I understand to be your concern, based on your writings. First, you believe that “the book is specifically designed to normalize gay marriage and is targeted toward the 2-7 year old age group.” Your second key concern is that you “find it inappropriate that this type of literature is available to this age group.” You cite your discussion with your daughter, and commented, “This was not the type of conversation I thought I would be having with my seven year old in the nightly bedtime routine.”

Finally, you state your strong belief, first, “in America and the beliefs of our founding fathers,” and second, that “marriage is a covenant between a man and a woman as stated in the Webster’s dictionary and also in the Bible.”

You directed me to the SarahBrannen.com site, which I also reviewed. I got a copy of “Uncle Bobby’s Wedding” today, and read it. I even hauled out my favorite Webster’s (the college edition, copyright 1960).

First, I think you’re right that the purpose of the book is to show a central event, the wedding of two male characters, as no big thing. The emotional center of the story, of course, is Chloe’s fear that she’s losing a favorite uncle to another relationship. That fear, I think, is real enough to be an issue for a lot of young children. But yes, Sarah Brannen clearly was trying to portray gay marriage as normal, as not nearly so important as the changing relationship between a young person and her favorite uncle.

Your second issue is a little trickier. You say that the book is inappropriate, and I infer that your reason is the topic itself: gay marriage. I think a lot of adults imagine that what defines a children’s book is the subject. But that’s not the case. Children’s books deal with anything and everything. There are children’s books about death (even suicide), adult alcoholism, family violence, and more. Even the most common fairy tales have their grim side: the father and stepmother of Hansel and Gretel, facing hunger and poverty, take the children into the woods, and abandon them to die! Little Red Riding Hood (in the original version, anyhow) was eaten by the wolf along with granny. There’s a fascinating book about this, by the bye, called “The Uses of Enchantment: the Meaning and Importance of Fairy Tales,” by psychologist Bruno Bettelheim. His thesis is that both the purpose and power of children’s literature is to help young people begin to make sense of the world. There is a lot out there that is confusing, or faintly threatening, and even dangerous in the world. Stories help children name their fears, understand them, work out strategies for dealing with life. In Hansel and Gretel, children learn that cleverness and mutual support might help you to escape bad situations. In Little Red Riding Hood, they learn not to talk to big bad strangers. Of course, not all children’s books deal with “difficult issues,” maybe not even most of them. But it’s not unusual.

So what defines a children’s book is the treatment, not the topic. “Uncle Bobby’s Wedding” is 27-28 pages long (if you count the dedication page). Generally, there are about 30 words per page, and each page is illustrated. The main character, and the key perspective, is that of a young girl. The book is published by G. P. Putnam’s Sons, “a division of Penguin Young Readers Group.” The Cataloging in Publication information (on the back side of the title page) shows that the catalogers of the Library of Congress identified it as an “E” book – easy or beginning reader. Bottom line: It’s hard for me to see it as anything but a children’s book.

You suggested that the book could be “placed in an area designating the subject matter,” or “labeled for parental guidance” by stating that “some material may be inappropriate for young children.” I have two responses. First, we tried the “parenting collection” approach a couple of times in my history here. And here’s what we found: nobody uses them. They constitute a barrier to discovery and use. The books there – and some very fine ones — just got lost. In the second case, I believe that every book in the children’s area, particularly in the area where usually the parent is reading the book aloud, involves parental guidance. The labeling issue is tricky, too: is the topic just homosexuality? Where babies come from? Authority figures that can’t be trusted? Stepmothers who abandon their children to die?

Ultimately, such labels make up a governmental determination of the moral value of the story. It seems to me – as a father who has done a lot of reading to his kids over the years – that that kind of decision is up to the parents, not the library. Because here’s the truth of the matter: not every parent has the same value system.

You feel that a book about gay marriage is inappropriate for young children. But another book in our collection, “Daddy’s Roommate,” was requested by a mother whose husband left her, and their young son, for another man. She was looking for a way to begin talking about this with son. Another book, “Alfie’s Home,” was purchased at the request of another mother looking for a way to talk about the suspected homosexuality of her young son from a Christian perspective. There are gay parents in Douglas County, right now, who also pay taxes, and also look for materials to support their views. We don’t have very many books on this topic, but we do have a handful.

In short, most of the books we have are designed not to interfere with parents’ notions of how to raise their children, but to support them. But not every parent is looking for the same thing.

Your third point, about the founders’ vision of America, is something that has been a matter of keen interest to me most of my adult life. In fact, I even wrote a book about it, where I went back and read the founders’ early writings about the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. What a fascinating time to be alive! What astonishing minds! Here’s what I learned: our whole system of government was based on the idea that the purpose of the state was to preserve individual liberties, not to dictate them. The founders uniformly despised many practices in England that compromised matters of individual conscience by restricting freedom of speech. Freedom of speech – the right to talk, write, publish, discuss – was so important to the founders that it was the first amendment to the Constitution – and without it, the Constitution never would have been ratified.

How then, can we claim that the founders would support the restriction of access to a book that really is just about an idea, to be accepted or rejected as you choose? What harm has this book done to anyone? Your seven year old told you, “Boys are not supposed to marry.” In other words, you have taught her your values, and those values have taken hold. That’s what parents are supposed to do, and clearly, exposure to this book, or several, doesn’t just overthrow that parental influence. It does, of course, provide evidence that not everybody agrees with each other; but that’s true, isn’t it?

The second part of your third point was your belief that marriage was between a man and a woman. My Webster’s actually gives several definitions of marriage: “1. the state of being married; relation between husband and wife…; 2. the act of marrying, wedding; 3. the rite or form used in marrying; 4. any close or intimate union.” Definitions 2-4, even as far back as 1960, could be stretched to include a wedding between two men. Word definitions change; legal rights change. In some parts of America, at least today, gay marriage is legal. If it’s legal, then how could writing a book about it be inappropriate?

Finally, then, I conclude that “Uncle Bobby’s Wedding” is a children’s book, appropriately categorized and shelved in our children’s picture book area. I fully appreciate that you, and some of your friends, strongly disagree with its viewpoint. But if the library is doing its job, there are lots of books in our collection that people won’t agree with; there are certainly many that I object to. Library collections don’t imply endorsement; they imply access to the many different ideas of our culture, which is precisely our purpose in public life.

As noted in our policies, you do have the right to appeal my decision to the Board of Trustees. If you’d like to do that, let me know, and I can schedule a meeting. Meanwhile, I’m more than happy to discuss this further with you. I do appreciate many things: your obvious value of reading, your frank and loving relationship with your child, your willingness to raise issues of importance to you in the public square, and more. Thank you, very much, for taking the time to raise your concerns with me. Although I suspect you may not agree with my decision, I hope it’s clear that I’ve given it a great deal of thought, and believe it is in accordance with both our guiding principles, and those, incidentally, of the founders of our nation.

Best wishes to you and your family.

I love to imagine that the woman requesting the removal of this book read this eloquently written letter, and actually did think about marriage and parenting and the rights of every individual to be happy. I love to imagine that she rescinded her removal request, checked the book out again, reread it to her daughter, then talked about the many different viewpoints in the world and the many different kinds of love and family. I am going to shed my cynical ways, for this one moment, and not let myself believe that she could have reacted in any other way.

XXXOOO,

Miss LGG



Hyperlinked Conversation
May 8, 2008, 9:19 pm
Filed under: Library Land, Web Resources | Tags:

I love living in a hyperlinked world!

I love that I can have an e-mail discussion with a friend starting with this, leading to this and finally wrapping up with this and that.

I love having conversations that begin with government spending/revolution (French and Dance Dance) and end with unicorn covered Trapper Keepers.

Awesome.

XXXOOO

Miss LGG



Almost a librarian!
May 2, 2008, 7:47 am
Filed under: Books, Library Land, Life | Tags: , ,

Five semesters down, one more to go and I am a full-fledged librarian! Look out world!

What I learned this semester in a nutshell…

  • Lots of people don’t read (Literacy and Library Involvement)
  • Lots of people don’t know how to read (Literacy and Library Involvement)
  • Read to your kids dammit (Literacy and Library Involvement)
  • Lots of people who do read like to read romance novels and the impossibly prolific James Patterson (Reader’s Advisory)
  • I shouldn’t judge people for reading romance novels or the impossibly prolific James Patterson (Reader’s Advisory)
  • My life these days closely resembles that of a character in a chick-lit novel (my least favorite genre), sans the fancy shoes and high-power career (Reader’s Advisory)
  • I shouldn’t judge myself for my chick-lit novel resembling life (Therapy)
  • I should spend more money on shoes (Random note to self)
  • I really need to take a break (Therapy)

I have decided to take the summer off to process all of this.

Let the bike riding, camping, vacation taking and guilt free relaxin’ ensue!

XXXOOO

Miss LGG



Better Late than Never: National Library Week!
April 20, 2008, 5:51 pm
Filed under: Library Land, Videos | Tags: ,

Last week was National Library Week! Check out these videos and celebrate belatedly by visiting your local library! It has free stuff!

As an information maven, I can attest to answering such an array of strange, personal and random questions:

Links to Miss LGG’s favorite libraries:

Chicago Public Library

Library of Congress

The Newberry Library

Folger Shakespeare Library

XXXOOO

Miss LGG



Assignment: Web Page Review
October 18, 2007, 2:38 pm
Filed under: Library Land | Tags:

Pretty but soulless
Tidy yet boring
The library website leaves me snoring.

I need to clarify my above harsh (and really bad) poetry by stating that this is not the fault of the library!

The main problem with the Rebecca Crown Library web page is that it seems to be stuck conforming to university-wide mandates of layout and style. In appearance, it seems to be merely a marketing tool for the university, rather than its own entity, which would allow for much more freedom and play. The DU athletics department has their own site (sponsored by CBS), different and certainly more exciting than the parent organization’s. Perhaps the library just needs a corporate sponsor (kidding)!

I understand that Dominican uses the website to market to potential students and parents, and that the over-all look is important to establishing a consistent brand. The Crown library, however, exists to provide quality service to current faculty, staff and students. Because the library web page must connect the community with large amounts of information, it is crucial that the site have a very efficient layout with much more interactivity! The library presence on the DU portal does a better job of this, but is still restricted by a set layout and design.

The main page of a library website should contain a map of all of the information held within. North Carolina State University Libraries (with their own site) do a fantastic job of this—by including the feature categories and what is held within them on the main page. The main page also includes a drop down box of most used features on the site, a search box and an FAQ:

picture-1.png

Without scrolling or clicking on multiple links, a user immediately knows where to go from finding info in the catalog and databases, to library news and contact information. North Carolina University also creates a user-rich experience by incorporating extensive subject guides, virtual tours, web-cams and interactive maps of Library locations.

Though the Crown Library now incorporates exciting Web 2.0 tools (yeah!) such as a blog, a wiki and IM they aren’t necessarily easy to find from the main page. Web 2.0 tools should be more prominent—just having them isn’t enough. They must be marketed and promoted like anything else! For example, Reeves Library at Moravian College has a Meebo box with the header “Research Help” on nearly every single page of the website—there is absolutely no missing it:

picture-2.png

In conclusion, the Crown library web page suffers from confinement!

Dear Dominican,

Set the library web page free! Give it flexibility and a room of its own to grow and change!

Sincerely, GSLIS Student